New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Legal Services Providers Face 'Big Hit' From Federal Cuts

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Legal Services Providers Face 'Big Hit' From Federal Cuts

By Todd Ruger Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

February 25, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The nation's providers of civil legal assistance for the poor could face more staffing reductions and provide services to fewer people if Congress is unable to resolve its latest budget crisis by March 1.

Unless Congress comes up with a last-minute deal next week to avoid $85 billion in automatic and arbitrary forced cuts, called sequestration, the Legal Services Corp. will suffer a 5 percent across-the-board cut to its annual funding, agency president Jim Sandman said. Those cuts would follow two years of steep cuts to LSC funding.

The new cuts would mean a $16.3 million cut to grants to the nation's civil legal services providers, Sandman said. The reductions would first affect payments in April. Since LSC is well into its current budget year, the monthly checks would be reduced 7.4 percent.

LSC, the largest source of funding nationwide for civil legal aid, conducted a webinar with agencies earlier this week detailing the nuts and bolts of the potential for cuts. Each state has different ways to add other funding to the programs, so each of the 134 agencies relying on LSC grants would be affected differently by the cuts.

LSC provides grants averaging about 30 percent of the budgets for seven New York state agencies. Those agencies helped 73,409 adults and 50,501 children last year.

The sequestration cuts "would be a big hit," said Raun Rasmussen, executive director of Legal Services NYC, which stands to lose $717,000 of its $14.4 million LSC allocation.

The group, which has a total budget of $40 million, would lose an additional $200,000 in federal grant money from sources other than LSC such as the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, IRS, and the Department of Justice for advice about foreclosure, taxes and domestic violence.

Finally, aside from sequestration, the group had been on track to lose 30 percent of its funding in the next two years due to regular, 10-year redistributions of funding based on the U.S. Census.

The Utica-based Legal Aid Society of Mid-New York gets 45 percent of its budget from LSC, meaning it stands to lose $95,778 from sequestration. It is now considering ways to make up those lost funds.

"We don't have much control over this," said Paul Lupia, the agency's executive director. "We hope that Congress and the president reach an agreement that doesn't affect us as deeply as sequestration cuts would."

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Congress
  • IRS
  • U.S. Census
  • Legal Services Inc. New York, New York
  • Senate Appropriations Committee
  • Legal Services Inc.
  • United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
  • Department of Justice

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  2. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  3. City Defends Heavy Use of Stop-and-Frisk by Police Dept.
    •      
  4. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  5. Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About NYLJ   |
  • Contact NYLJ   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media