New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > State Bar Is Committed to Preventing Wrongful Convictions

Font Size: increase font decrease font

State Bar Is Committed to Preventing Wrongful Convictions

New York Law Journal

January 22, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
Seymour James

Seymour James
NYLJ/Rick Kopstein

The legal community in New York state is extraordinarily diverse, but regardless of practice setting or area of expertise, our profession is characterized by a shared commitment to promoting reform in the law and facilitating the administration of justice. Those values are also central to our mission at the New York State Bar Association.

Most attorneys would agree that the conviction of any individual for a crime he or she did not commit is a grave offense against the integrity of our justice system. Preventing such wrongful convictions has long been a priority for the State Bar, and it is one that we will continue to advance vigorously during this year's legislative session.

Taking Action

Last year, we urged lawmakers to pass a series of measures including expanding the DNA database, videotaping interrogations, improving police lineups, requiring prosecutors to turn over more exculpatory evidence, and allowing defendants to obtain DNA evidence even after a guilty plea. We commended the governor and legislature for their passage of legislation expanding the DNA database and providing criminal defendants greater access to DNA evidence, but we remain committed to achieving comprehensive reforms with additional protections.

In order to draw attention to this important issue, we participated in two press conferences last spring, joining with wrongfully convicted individuals, as well as Assemblymember Joseph Lentol, Senator Ruth Hassell-Thompson and Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld of The Innocence Project. We heard powerful and tragic stories from victims who spent years—sometimes decades—in prison after being convicted for crimes they did not commit. While they were wrongfully imprisoned, the real perpetrators were free and all too often committed additional offenses.

Videotaped Interrogations

In November, the State Bar included the prevention of wrongful convictions on our slate of top legislative priorities for 2013. One measure that would prevent wrongful convictions is mandatory videotaping of custodial interrogations. Videotaping interrogations would help secure the conviction of guilty individuals while preventing the wrongful conviction of the innocent. Opponents of mandatory recording contend that voluntary participation by law enforcement would be sufficient to prevent wrongful convictions, but unfortunately, voluntary use of videotaped interrogations is inconsistent throughout the state and is not currently utilized in many counties.

The New York State Bar Association has advocated for mandatory recording of interrogations since 2004, and we have sponsored and monitored successful pilot programs in a number of counties. Mandatory videotaping is a key component of the wrongful conviction package we have been advancing in recent years, and we were pleased that the Assembly passed a bill last year that would require videotaping interrogations. New York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly's recent decision to voluntarily record interrogations for some serious crimes, and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's pledge to support it with public money, represent significant progress. After their announcement, in a Letter to the Editor published in the New York Times, we once again called on the governor and the legislature to mandate the practice by law.

Committed to Justice

Every wrongful conviction is a fundamental failure of our justice system, and every time an innocent person is convicted of a crime he or she did not commit, the real perpetrator is free to commit more crimes. We will continue our commitment to preventing wrongful convictions, and we hope that 2013 will bring meaningful and comprehensive measures to protect the innocent, enhance public safety and uphold the integrity of our justice system.

Seymour W. James Jr., President of the New York State Bar Association, is the Attorney-in-Charge of the criminal practice of The Legal Aid Society in New York City.



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Michael

    January 22, 2013 10:59 AM

    How will expanding the DNA database stop the prosecutor from illegally withholding evidence, or stacking a jury with pro-prosecution jurors? How will it prevent the cops from testi-lying and offering false evidence against a defendant? Why not ask for a mandatory compensation law, drawn from the District Attorney and Police budgets, to give wrongly convicted persons one million dollars for every year they spent rotting in prison? Why not ask for a modification of the law, rescinding the immunity prosecutors enjoy, when they are found to commit blatant, negligent or erregious errors that result in wrongful convictions? Guess lawyers only want the rest of us to submit our DNA, and only want non-lawyers to be held liable for illegal, unethical or immoral conduct.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Legal Aid Society
  • New York State Bar Association
  • New York Times Company

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  2. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  3. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  4. Circuit Reverses Intentional Bias Finding in City Firefighter Hiring
    •      
  5. U.S. Supreme Court Examines Voting Rights in Two Cases
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media