The unanimous Second Department panel, describing its role as that of a "13th juror" conducting an independent review of the weight of the evidence, concluded the identification of a complainant who admits he was drunk, high and focused on the weapon rather than the person carrying it was too skimpy to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Panel Upsets Conviction After Questioning Witness Reliability
New York Law Journal
January 14, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.