Edward Flanders, a partner at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, Ranah L. Esmaili, a senior associate at the firm, and Peter Ostrovski, an associate, write that while the international comity abstention and forum non conveniens doctrines look to similar factors for guidance, an analysis of the same set of facts under each can lead a judge to reach opposite, and seemingly inconsistent, conclusions.
A Tale of Two Doctrines
New York Law Journal
January 14, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.