A 'Fundamentally Flawed' Grand Jury Forces Reversal

Taking what it called a rare step, an appeals court has reversed the conviction of a man for robbing a convenience store in 2010 because the evidence heard by grand jurors was so rife with inadmissible elements that it invalidated his identification.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.