Big Boy Letters and Non-Reliance Provisions

In his Corporate Litigation column, Joseph M. McLaughlin, a partner at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, writes that a non-reliance provision that is not boilerplate, but instead the product of negotiation between sophisticated parties dealing at arm's-length, may negate allegations of reasonable reliance on any extra-contractual representations.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.