New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Lacking a Duty, State Is Spared Liability in 'Tragic' Boat Mishap

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Lacking a Duty, State Is Spared Liability in 'Tragic' Boat Mishap

By Joel Stashenko Contact All Articles 

New York Law Journal

November 30, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Estate of Mary Helen Metz v. NYS, No. 208

ALBANY - The State is not liable for the deaths and injuries caused when an excursion boat tipped over on Lake George, the state Court of Appeals decided yesterday.

Twenty passengers were killed and several of the 27 others on board the Ethan Allen were injured in the 2005 accident.

Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman (See Profile), writing for a 6-0 court, called the capsizing of the Ethan Allen "tragic" and "disastrous."

However, the plaintiffs in Metz v. State of New York, 208, have failed to demonstrate that a "special duty" existed between the state and the passengers on the Ethan Allen the day it capsized that would overcome the state's argument that it was protected from liability by sovereign immunity, Lippman said.

Citing the Court of Appeals' rulings in O'Connor v. City of New York, 58 NY2d 184 (1983), Valdez v. City of New York, 18 NY3d 69 (2011) and McLean v. City of New York, 12 NY3d 194 (2009), Lippman said it is now "well settled" that the state is "not liable for the negligent performance of a government function" unless there existed "a special duty to the injured person, in contrast to a general duty owed to the public."

"The regulatory scheme at issue here does require inspectors to issue a certificate of inspection indicating that the vessel is safe and, specifically, certifying the number of passengers the vessel can safely transport," Lippman wrote. "However, these statutory obligations do not create a special duty of care owed by the state to particular passengers."

Although the Navigation Law statute that mandates inspections of public vessels by the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation is designed to protect public safety in general, it "did not create a duty to particular individuals," the chief judge wrote.

Moreover, he said that the court's conclusion was bolstered by the fact that the Navigation Law does not provide a private right of action against the state, but instead for fines and criminal penalties to be imposed upon vessel owners and operators for violations.

Lippman noted that the law was amended in 2007 in response to the Ethan Allen accident. While requiring additional safety measures and enhancing penalties for violations, the Legislature "did not provide for a private right of action," the chief judge said.

Lippman said the court was aware that the "upshot" of current law is to leave victims "without an adequate remedy."

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Appellate Division
  • Associated Press
  • Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
  • Ethan Allen Inc.
  • U.S. Coast Guard
  • Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Transportation Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  2. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  3. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  4. Largest New York Firms Show Steady Growth
    •      
  5. Circuit Reverses Intentional Bias Finding in City Firefighter Hiring
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment

Judges Weigh Delaware Court of Chancery's Arbitration Program
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media