New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Ex-Parole Commissioners Decry Rescission of 'Cop Killer' Release

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Ex-Parole Commissioners Decry Rescission of 'Cop Killer' Release

By John Caher Contact All Articles 

New York Law Journal

November 26, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 

ALBANY - Six former New York state parole commissioners have signed on to an unprecedented amicus brief that accuses the board of caving in to outside pressure to keep behind bars a "cop killer" who long ago paid his debt to society.

The amicus brief in the case of Pablo Costello accompanies a petition alleging that the Board of Parole withered under a media spotlight and pressure from the New York City Patrolmen's Benevolent Association (PBA) and rescinded parole for an offender who had been approved for release and was within four days of walking out of prison for the first time in more than 30 years.

Read Costello's brief and the Board of Parole's reply.

Former commissioners, including two previous chairmen and three parole board members appointed by Governor George Pataki, who had an especially strict parole viewpoint, are urging the Appellate Division, Third Department, to hold the Board of Parole to a higher standard and prevent it from revoking an inmate's release simply because victims object after parole has been approved.

Simultaneously, advocates for another "cop killer," Samuel Hamilton, are gearing up to challenge the repeated parole denial of an inmate who has both the prosecutor who sent him away in 1983 and the state corrections commissioner on his side.

The Costello and Hamilton cases are similar in that both men have spent about 30 years in prison, both have solid institutional records and widespread support, both are in the cross-hairs of the PBA and neither of them, despite repeated visits to the parole board, can secure his freedom.

Further, neither of them killed anybody.

Costello was 22-years-old in 1978 when he was involved in a holdup at a Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, auto parts store. Records show that Costello was the lookout while his accomplice, Luis Torres, robbed the proprietor at gunpoint.

While the robbery was taking place, New York City Police Officer David Guttenberg happened upon Costello's double-parked car and walked toward the store to find the owner. Costello fled when he saw Guttenberg approaching. Guttenberg went into the shop, happening on an in-progress robbery. Torres shot and killed the 49-year-old father of four.

Costello was convicted of felony murder and sentenced by the late Justice Sybil Hart-Kooper to a 25-year-to-life term, even though the prosecutor recommended a 20-to-life sentence. Torres, convicted of intentional murder, received the same sentence and died in prison in 1986, records show.

When Costello appeared before the parole board for the fourth time in 2009, he was 53-years-old, had a good disciplinary record, had completed numerous vocational and educational programs, had obtained an associate's degree from Dutchess County Community College and had picked up 12 additional credits from Cornell University. He had authored several scholarly articles in the Puerto Rico Society of Genealogy journal. Costello had job offers and a stable place to live with his wife and 30-year-old daughter, records show.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Todd Houslanger, Esq.

    November 26, 2012 11:25 AM

    I am awestruck by the brave display of courage exhibited by the former members of the Board of Parole to speak out in pursuit of justice and righteousness. In over 24 years defending individuals in parole revocation hearings, it is refreshing to see truth above politics. The rationale for indeterminate sentences (a minimum and maximum) and for the establishment of the Board of Parole is too allow appointed officials to independently evaluate the risks to the community upon release and balance that with the rehabilitation sought by incarceration. It is sadly unfortunate when officials succumb to political pressures. The situations above clearly highlight where our penal institutions have succeeded and the Parole review systems have failed. Our citizens and community need to have confidence in both so that we can all rely upon and trust our system of justice. It is now up to the Courts to review with impartiality. My faith is with them. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Mayer Brown
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • NYCPBA
  • PBA
  • Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
  • Attica Legal Aid Bureau
  • Puerto Rico Society of Genealogy
  • Dutchess County Community College
  • Appellate Division
  • Third Department
  • Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
  • New York State Defenders Association Inc.
  • Cornell University
  • August Parole Board
  • Daily News LP

Key categories

    
  • Local Government

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  2. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  3. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  4. Circuit Reverses Intentional Bias Finding in City Firefighter Hiring
    •      
  5. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Three Strategies for Reducing Class Action Costs

Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

LegalTech West Coast to Kick Off With 'Tech Audit' Keynote

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lenders Win On Foreclosures
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Justices: Doc Interviews With Defense Are Attorney Work Product
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media