Debevoise & Plimpton's Christopher K. Tahbaz and Corey S. Whiting review a major decision of the Indian Supreme Court reversing nearly a decade of jurisprudence widely viewed as unfriendly to international arbitration; the amendment of the arbitration rules at the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, China's leading arbitral institution; and a very public schism between CIETAC's Beijing headquarters and two of its sub-commissions.
Font Size:
![]()
Amendments, Decisions Among International Arbitration Developments in Asia
New York Law Journal
November 26, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
