New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Thanks for Nothirg

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Question & Answer

Thanks for Nothirg

Ann Israel

The thing about thank you notes is that they may not get you the job but they can definitely lose it for you.  Lawyers are extremely anal and, maybe it's an urban legend, but I have heard that some people have lost offers because of typos or other sloppiness in their thank you notes.

  • twitterTwitter
  • deliciousdel.icio.us
  • digg Digg
  • redditReddit
  • newsvineNewsvine
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • stumbleuponStumbleupon
  • googleGoogle Bookmarks
  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Write to the Editor

Dear Some People:

Well, I hope you are not included in that group of "some people" because that is a tough lesson to learn. I have discussed the danger of typos and, as you put it, other sloppiness, in thank you notes, resumes, cover letters, etc., many times before. And yes, you are correct – I do know of a number of specific examples where people have lost offers, or at least the opportunity to return for call-back interviews, because of an oversight in a thank you note.

This could be attributed to lawyers being extremely anal as you have pointed out or perhaps this is simply a case of the recipient of the note realizing that the mistake indicates some serious flaws that are not acceptable when considering the hiring of a potential candidate.

Whether the thank you note is hand-written or computer generated, a mistake or typo should not happen. You should proofread a thank you note once, twice and then a third time before sending it out. You might even want to read it out loud just to be certain that there are no mistakes. This is serious stuff (and by stuff I don't mean malarkey as defined by Vice President Biden!).

I know that this column has had typos from time to time and I have an editor who proofs and edits it after I have gone over it numerous times. There is no good excuse for the typos that slip through although we try our best to not allow this to happen. But in a brief thank you note there is no excuse whatsoever. And that thank you note is the only thing at that moment standing between you and a job offer or a callback for an advanced interview.

You have described lawyers as being extremely anal but let's think about what lawyers do for a living . . . don't they really have to be incredibly thorough, meticulous and excruciatingly precise in their work or else risk everything for their clients? I suppose you might describe someone with those characteristics as anal but I think you might also describe them as the characteristics of the top attorneys.

If thorough, meticulous and precise become descriptive characteristics of successful attorneys then it would make sense that a thank you note filled with typos might raise a red flag. It might suggest to the recipient that the author was careless or rushed…exactly the qualities that could jeopardize a client and his business to the firm.

I will tell you my personal experiences with thank you notes when I have been interviewing candidates for positions with my firm. You are correct when you state that the thank you note doesn't always get you the job but I will say that it does leave a positive impression. I always remember the candidate who took the time to sit down and write a note to me thanking me for my time to meet with him/her. It's a thoughtful, polite gesture that speaks volumes to me. However, you are also correct that a poorly written thank you note might suddenly eliminate a top ranked candidate.

When I receive one of those notes that has spelled either my first or last name (or both!) incorrectly, other words throughout the note are misspelled, perhaps grammar is completely ignored, or there are other obvious mistakes throughout the note, it is hard for me to think about the thoughtful gesture instead of the careless tone. This is someone trying to impress me enough that I will bring him or her back for a second interview…is this really someone I want to represent my candidates to my clients? I don't think so.

So now take it a step further…is this someone that a partner in a law firm trusts working on assignments for his clients? I don't think so.

Instead of thinking of lawyers as being anal, start thinking of yourself as being careful when representing yourself for your career. Take the time to ask yourself how you would judge yourself if you sat in the interviewer's chair. Proof your resume, your cover letters, your thank you notes and then once you have done that, proof them again…and again. Best wishes!

Sincerely,
Ann M. Israel

  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Write to the Editor

Most Popular Headlines

  1. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  2. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  3. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  4. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  5. Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Amid Spy Scandal, Russia Boots Baker & McKenzie Lawyer

Survey: Firm Leaders Admit Downturn's Permanent Impact

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court System, Counties Agree on 3 Court Facility Upgrades

Guardian Who Delayed Final Account Must Pay Referee Fee
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out

McVay Wins Superior Court Nod With Western Turnout
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Insurer Beats Bid By Bilked Client
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Barnes Asks For Court-Appointed Lawyer To Help Defend Brooks

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About NYLJ   |
  • Contact NYLJ   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media