Marion M. Walsh, an attorney with Littman Krooks and a certified Impartial Hearing Officer for children with disabilities, analyzes a recent Second Circuit decision that set an important precedent in tuition reimbursement cases, under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, ruling that, in evaluating an Individualized Education Program for a student with a disability, courts and administrative officers must examine an IEP prospectively as of the time of its creation.
Font Size:
![]()
Use of Retrospective Testimony in Special Education Hearings
New York Law Journal
October 11, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.
