New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Mootness Dooms Suit Against County Attorney

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Mootness Dooms Suit Against County Attorney

By John Caher Contact All Articles 

New York Law Journal

October 9, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Mahler v. Campanie, 2502-11

A civil action accusing Madison County's part-time county attorney of self-dealing has been dismissed because the attorney has paid back some of the money and there is little likelihood the situation will arise again, Albany Supreme Court Justice Michael Lynch (See Profile) has decided.

Mahler v. Campanie, 21502-11, involves a part-time county attorney, John Campanie, who became the target of a taxpayer action. The suit alleged that after an Indian land claim case involving Madison County was referred to Nixon Peabody, the firm in turn cross-referred some of the work to Campanie's private law practice. Campanie revealed the payments—roughly $800,000 over a dozen years—on his annual ethics disclosure form and the payments were approved by the state.

After the lawsuit was filed, Campanie refunded approximately $30,000, representing the prior year's payment—the only portion at issue because of a one-year statute of limitations. Additionally, Campanie has affirmed that he will not seek future payments from Nixon Peabody, and the state has barred any future payments. Regardless, the plaintiffs sought an injunction and an admission of wrongdoing (NYLJ, Aug. 24).

But Lynch found the claim moot. "This is not a situation where a party, acting alone, has simply discontinued conduct challenged as illegal, leaving open the real prospect of simply resuming the same conduct once the case was dismissed," Lynch wrote. "Here, each participant in the underlying transaction has represented that no further payments…will be made."

Lynch said the refund of a year's payments and discontinuance of future payments renders the case moot. "This holds true even without an express acknowledgment of wrongdoing by the defendants," Lynch wrote.



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  2. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  3. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  4. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  5. Judge Rejects Ruling of JHO Who Modified Her Order
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media