Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's Daniel L. Brockett and Jeremy D. Andersen write: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) is clear on its face: "Malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind may be alleged generally." Nonetheless, almost 40 years after the rule's adoption, the Second Circuit began requiring plaintiffs to plead facts giving rise to a "strong inference" of scienter.
Font Size: 
Pleading Common Law Fraud in the Second Circuit
New York Law Journal
September 27, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.
