James M. McGuire and Steven A. Engel, partners at Dechert, write: The highly fact-sensitive nature of CPLR 5519(c) applications and the Appellate Division's broad discretion make it impracticable to attempt to shed much light on what arguments are likely to be of particular importance in persuading either the duty judge or a full panel of the court to grant or deny relief under CPLR 5519(c). Nonetheless, a couple of points can be made.
Font Size: 
'Stay' for Awhile: CPLR 5519(c) Stay Applications in the First Department
New York Law Journal
August 27, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.
