In his Contract Law column, Fulbright & Jaworski partner Glen Banks writes that the majority in the Court of Appeals' recent holding in 'Georgia Malone v. Rieder' appeared to be reluctant to hold a third party accountable for using information sold to it. However, as the dissenters stressed, the focus of an unjust enrichment claim should be whether that party received a benefit that in equity and good conscience should go to plaintiff.
Font Size: 
Addressing Unjust Enrichment Claim at the Pleading Stage
New York Law Journal
July 23, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.
