New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Panel Rejects Challenge to Same-Sex Marriage Law

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Panel Rejects Challenge to Same-Sex Marriage Law

The Associated Press

July 9, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate, CA 12-00313

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, has rejected a challenge to New York's year-old same-sex marriage law, finding closed-door negotiations among senators and gay marriage supporters, including Governor Andrew Cuomo did not violate any laws.

The Rochester-based court ruled on July 9 against gay marriage opponents who argued that Republican state senators violated New York's open meeting rules ahead of the law's passage last year.

New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms said Cuomo and another gay marriage supporter, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, met behind closed doors with the Senate's Republican majority in violation of the Open Meeting Law.

The appeals court heard the case after Acting State Supreme Court Judge Robert Wiggins in Livingston County ruled in November that he did not have enough facts to rule on whether the open meetings law was violated (NYLJ, Dec. 1, 2011). Wiggins dismissed other claims.

New York's open meeting law requires public access to the deliberations of legislative bodies, but Attorney General Eric Schneiderman argued for the state that the Republican caucus with invited guests was exempt, even if the guests are not in the same party. In a 5-0 ruling in New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms v. New York State Senate, 644 CA 12-00313, the court agreed.

"In the event that we were to adopt plaintiffs' limited definition of 'guests,' it would be impossible for a Democratic member of a governor's office, such as a budget director, to speak to a majority Republican caucus," according to the decision.

Mathew Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel, which represented the group opposing the law, said he expected to seek leave to appeal the ruling.

"It's a disappointment, because this gives a green light to the politicians to [use] strong arm tactics behind closed doors and shut out the people from the process," Staver said.

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • New York State Senate
  • Liberty Counsel
  • Appellate Division
  • Supreme Court

Key categories

    
  • Civil Rights and Constitutional Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  2. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  3. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  4. Circuit Reverses Intentional Bias Finding in City Firefighter Hiring
    •      
  5. U.S. Supreme Court Examines Voting Rights in Two Cases
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media