Font Size: increase font decrease font

Who Can Get Your Tweets, and Can You Object?

New York Law Journal

July 3, 2012

In his State E-discovery column, Mark A. Berman, a partner at Ganfer & Shore, discusses 'People v. Harris,' where a criminal court was asked to address the complex issue of whether a defendant and/or Twitter has standing, under either a constitutional analysis or the Stored Communications Act, to quash a subpoena issued without a warrant that sought to obtain defendant's "user information" and the substance of his Tweets.

The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS