In their Federal E-Discovery column, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison partners H. Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. Toal write that the Third Circuit recently found that a lower court's expansive reading of 28 U.S.C. §1920 went too far, improperly taxing e-discovery costs. However, a federal judge in the Ninth Circuit has decided in two cases to follow the broader and more liberal reading originally offered by the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Font Size: 
Recent Developments in Recovering E-Discovery Costs
New York Law Journal
June 5, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.
