In his Contract Law column, Glen Banks, a partner at Fulbright & Jaworski, analyzes a pair of rulings illustrating that despite the well-established principle of contract law that a court should determine and enforce what the parties intended, courts may still be inclined to apply a judicial perception of what the parties "really intended" or a judicial notion of what is fair.
Appellate Decisions on Court's Role in Deciding What Is Fair or Intended
New York Law Journal
May 31, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.