In his Contract Law column, Glen Banks, a partner at Fulbright & Jaworski, analyzes a pair of rulings illustrating that despite the well-established principle of contract law that a court should determine and enforce what the parties intended, courts may still be inclined to apply a judicial perception of what the parties "really intended" or a judicial notion of what is fair.
Font Size: 
Appellate Decisions on Court's Role in Deciding What Is Fair or Intended
New York Law Journal
May 31, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.
