New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Bribe and Prejucice

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Question & Answer

Bribe and Prejucice

Ann Israel

May 22, 2012

Firmhunter.com, a legal recruiting firm, offers $10,000 back, in hard cash, to the associates they place and assures that the firms won't find out about it. What's your opinion of this?

  • twitterTwitter
  • deliciousdel.icio.us
  • digg Digg
  • redditReddit
  • newsvineNewsvine
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • stumbleuponStumbleupon
  • googleGoogle Bookmarks
  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Write to the Editor

Dear Assured:

Why are you interested in my opinion on this? Surely you know what I think. I suspect you have visited my firm, and several of my worthy competitors, and told us about this other firm – if they actually exist – and have tried to get any one of us to come up with some cash offers in exchange for the privilege of representing you. Thanks, but no thanks.

The key to figuring out what I think about this situation is located in the fact that this search firm assures their candidates that the firms won't find out their little payout. I wonder why that smacks of something similar to a bribe.

For your information, many of the law firms have a clause in their fee agreements that ask the search firms to agree to abide by the National Association of Legal Search Consultants' (NALSC) Code of Ethics whether or not they are members of that organization. Within that Code of Ethics is a paragraph that states, "No search firm shall withhold candidate information, which the employer would reasonably consider essential to its hiring decision."

Now, I can't definitely say that taking a cash payout is essential to a firm's hiring decision but then again, it might be. I do know that in the NALSC Code there are very specific clauses that prohibit NALSC member firms from doing what "Firmhunter.com" is attempting to do: "Except for fee-sharing agreements between search firms, no member shall make payments of any kind to gain business referrals or to induce others into a relationship as a client or candidate."

It is very clear to me that offering a payment to induce someone into a candidate relationship is unethical and not the way I would ever conduct business. Is that how you would try to get a new client to give you their legal business?

I have tried to find Firmhunter.com online and cannot locate the firm anywhere. The truth of the matter is that I have never heard of them. My guess is that even offering a goodly sum of money to potential candidates was not enough to keep them in business. The attorney search firms that stay in business over the years are those who are ethical and honest and hardworking and know how to place their candidates in the best positions out there. What they offer are skills instead of bribes.

Anytime someone tells you that the employer won't find out about something, think twice. The employer will always find out about it in the end and you will look as if you were hiding something . . . which you were. Best wishes.

Sincerely,
Ann M. Israel

  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Write to the Editor

Most Popular Headlines

  1. Departure of President Leaves Dean in Charge at Brooklyn Law
    •      
  2. NYLJ 100
    •      
  3. Lawyers' Pro Bono Hours, Contributions, Will Be Public
    •      
  4. NYLJ 100: Regional Firm Growth Outpaces Larger Firms in 2012
    •      
  5. City and Clinic Spar Over Bill for Law Student Representation
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About NYLJ   |
  • Contact NYLJ   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media