In their Antitrust Trade and Practice column, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom's Neal R. Stoll and Shepard Goldfein write: The decision in 'EPIC' that the FTC's decision whether to enforce its consent order with Google is committed to agency discretion and is not subject to judicial review clarifies just another instance where the court will simply not impose its judgment upon an administrative agency. Absent legislative intervention, the proposition that without a "mandatory discretionary duty" to enforce a consent order, the judiciary's non-intervention policy will continue to limit judicial review of agency inaction for years to come.
Third-Party Effort to Enforce Google Consent Order: an EPIC Failure
New York Law Journal
April 10, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.