Marvin L. Frank, a member of Murray, Frank & Sailer, reviews cases where defendants have sought to quash a discovery demand in a state court on the grounds that plaintiffs were attempting to circumvent the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, which automatically stays discovery in federal securities actions during the pendency of a motion to dismiss.
Font Size:
![]()
Outside Counsel
Staying Derivative Actions Pursuant to PSLRA and SLUSA
New York Law Journal
October 21, 2005
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.


