Home > BYRON RUDOLPH plf-res, v. A.A.A. AMBULETTE SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY plf-res, NERISSA FORD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS THIRDPARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; ET AL., THIRD-PARTY def

Font Size: increase font decrease font

BYRON RUDOLPH plf-res, v. A.A.A. AMBULETTE SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY plf-res, NERISSA FORD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS THIRDPARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; ET AL., THIRD-PARTY def

Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Dillon, JJ.Other Decisions

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

February 20, 2013

BYRON RUDOLPH plf-res, v. A.A.A. AMBULETTE SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY plf-res, NERISSA FORD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS THIRDPARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; ET AL., THIRD-PARTY def — Application by the defendants third-party defendants-appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 16, 2012.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.