FRITZ PAUYO res, v. JOCELYNE A. PAUYO, ap — (INDEX NO. 33490/08)In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for tortious interference with contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sunshine, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated February 24, 2011, which granted that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to appoint Fritz Pauyo as a receiver of her interest in Fito Taxi Service, Inc.
Font Size: 
FRITZ PAUYO res, v. JOCELYNE A. PAUYO, ap
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
January 25, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
