Home > THOMAS DEGEN ap, v. UNIONDALE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY plf-res, CONOR CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS, INC. DEFENDANTSres, HERRICKS MECHANICAL CORP., THIRD-PARTY def-res

Font Size: increase font decrease font

THOMAS DEGEN ap, v. UNIONDALE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY plf-res, CONOR CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS, INC. DEFENDANTSres, HERRICKS MECHANICAL CORP., THIRD-PARTY def-res

Rivera, J.P.; Balkin, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ.Other Decisions

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

January 18, 2013

THOMAS DEGEN ap, v. UNIONDALE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY plf-res, CONOR CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS, INC. DEFENDANTSres, HERRICKS MECHANICAL CORP., THIRD-PARTY def-res — Application by the respondent Uniondale Union Free School District pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 3, 2012.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.