New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Decisions > WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, ETC., plf-res, v. EDWARD MURPHY, ap, PAUL LUCIANO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT def

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Decision

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, ETC., plf-res, v. EDWARD MURPHY, ap, PAUL LUCIANO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT def

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

New York Law Journal

January 9, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •    

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, ETC., plf-res, v. EDWARD MURPHY, ap, PAUL LUCIANO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 18, 2012.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 22, 2013, and the reply brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

Most Viewed Articles

  1. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  2. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  3. City Defends Heavy Use of Stop-and-Frisk by Police Dept.
    •      
  4. Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation
    •      
  5. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  • About NYLJ   |
  • Contact NYLJ   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media