New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Decisions > LORI SCHONFELD, res, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ap

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Decision

LORI SCHONFELD, res, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ap

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

New York Law Journal

January 7, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •    

LORI SCHONFELD, res, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 29, 2012.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until January 8, 2013, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.

Most Viewed Articles

  1. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  2. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  3. City Defends Heavy Use of Stop-and-Frisk by Police Dept.
    •      
  4. Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation
    •      
  5. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  • About NYLJ   |
  • Contact NYLJ   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media