New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Decisions > ARON FRIED, res, v. PHILIP TUCKER, ET AL., ap, ETC. def

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Decision

ARON FRIED, res, v. PHILIP TUCKER, ET AL., ap, ETC. def

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

New York Law Journal

December 17, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •    

ARON FRIED, res, v. PHILIP TUCKER, ET AL., ap, ETC. def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 17, 2012.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion the notice of appeal from the decision is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from a judgment of the same court dated September 24, 2012 (see CPLR 5520[c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2013, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SKELOS and DILLON, JJ., concur.

Most Viewed Articles

  1. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  2. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  3. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  4. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  5. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media