New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Decisions > Callistro v. Bebbington, No. 242

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Decision

Musa Callistro, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian Jessica Rivera, Appellant v. Michael W. Bebbington, M.D., et al., Respondents, No. 242 SSM 46

New York State Court of Appeals

Civil Practice

New York Law Journal

December 12, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •    

Cite as: Callistro v. Bebbington, No. 242, NYLJ 1202581035250, at *1 (Ct. of App., Decided December 11, 2012)

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

Decided December 11, 2012

Submitted by John M. Daly, for appellant.

Submitted by Daniel S. Ratner, for respondents.

‌

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendants' alleged malpractice in failing to perform a caesarean section rather than a vaginal delivery was the cause of child's alleged cognitive, receptive, and expressive deficits and developmental disability. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

Most Viewed Articles

  1. Departure of President Leaves Dean in Charge at Brooklyn Law
    •      
  2. NYLJ 100
    •      
  3. Budget Plan Contains Funds to Reassign 26,000 18-B Cases
    •      
  4. 2013 Rising Stars
    •      
  5. NYLJ 100: Regional Firm Growth Outpaces Larger Firms in 2012
    •      
  • About NYLJ   |
  • Contact NYLJ   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media