New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Decisions > James v. Loran Realty V Corp., No. 45

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Decision

Kayla James, &c., et al., Appellants v. Loran Realty V Corp., Defendant, Frank Palazzolo, et al., Respondents, No. 45

New York State Court of Appeals

Business Law

New York Law Journal

November 30, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •    

Cite as: James v. Loran Realty V Corp., No. 45, NYLJ 1202579741648, at *1 (Ct. of App., )

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

Decided November 29, 2012

Submitted by Brian J. Shoot, for appellants

Submitted by Lawrence M. Gottlieb, for respondent Palazzolo

‌The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

Plaintiffs, as the party seeking to pierce the corporate veil, had the burden to show that the individual defendants "abused the privilege of doing business in the corporate form to perpetrate a wrong or injustice against" them (Matter of Morris v. New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin., 82 NY2d 135, 141 [1993]). Plaintiffs did not meet this burden, inasmuch as they failed to produce evidence that the individual defendants took steps to render the corporate defendant insolvent in order to avoid plaintiffs' claim for damages or otherwise defraud plaintiffs.

‌

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

Most Viewed Articles

  1. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  2. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  3. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  4. Circuit Reverses Intentional Bias Finding in City Firefighter Hiring
    •      
  5. U.S. Supreme Court Examines Voting Rights in Two Cases
    •      
  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media