New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Decisions > The People v. James A. Harris, Jr., No. 233

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Decision

The People &c., Appellant v. James A. Harris, Jr., Respondent, No. 233

New York State Court of Appeals

Criminal Practice

New York Law Journal

November 27, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •    

Cite as: The People v. James A. Harris, Jr., No. 233, NYLJ 1202579483968, at *1 (Ct. of App., Decided November 27, 2012)

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

Decided November 27, 2012

Submitted by Andrew W. Kass, for appellant

Submitted by Warren S. Hecht, for respondent

 

*1

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed. There is support in the record for the Appellate Division's determination that defendant unequivocally invoked his right to counsel while in custody, and that mixed question of law and fact is beyond our further review. We agree with the Appellate Division that the hearing court's error in failing to suppress defendant's statements was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and that defendant is entitled to a new trial.Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

 

Most Viewed Articles

  1. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  2. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  3. Circuit Reverses Intentional Bias Finding in City Firefighter Hiring
    •      
  4. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  5. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media