New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Decisions > Lewis v. Joseph Caputo, &c., No. 236

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Decision

Bernard Lewis, Respondent v. Joseph Caputo, &c., Appellant, The City of New York, et al., Defendants, No. 236 SSM 40

New York State Court of Appeals

Civil Practice

New York Law Journal

November 28, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •    

Cite as: Lewis v. Joseph Caputo, &c., No. 236, NYLJ 1202579483853, at *1 (Ct. of App., Decided November 27, 2012)

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

Decided November 27, 2012

Submitted by June A. Witterschein, for appellant.

Submitted by Michael J. Andrews, for respondent.

 

*1

MEMORANDUM:

 

‌The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed.

The Appellate Division incorrectly determined that

*2

defendant failed to provide a sufficient basis for establishing probable cause as a matter of law. While different inferences as to plaintiff's guilt or innocence of the underlying crime are possible, only one reasonable inference could be drawn from the Facts regarding probable cause. Therefore, the issue was not one properly presented to the jury for determination (see Veras v. Truth Verification Corp., 57 NY2d 947 [1982], affirming for the reasons stated at 87 AD2d 381 [1st Dept 1982]; cf. Smith v. County of Nassau, 34 NY2d 18 [1974]).

 

‌

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

Most Viewed Articles

  1. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  2. Legal Services NYC Employees Strike; Lower Intake Expected
    •      
  3. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  4. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  5. Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation
    •      
  • Books
  • Advertise
  • Contact NYLJ
  • About NYLJ
  • RSS
  • Subscribe
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media