The multi-billion-dollar fight over whether Chevron should pay for environmental damages in Ecuador or whether that country's judicial system delivered a tainted verdict returned Monday to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
- Court's Role as 'De Facto Collection Agency' Is Faulted
- Judge Denies City's Refusal to Rehire School Guard
- Court Allows Claim of Sexual Hostility at West Point
- Tardy Foreclosure Answer Should Be Accepted, Panel Says
- Challenge Critics, Arbitration Lawyer Urges Conference
- Judge to Review Mental Health Records in Lawsuit
Malvin Omar Urena, Plaintiff-Appellant v. City of New York, et al., Defendants-Respondents, 22611/13; 14825
Warrant Offers No Shield for False Arrest, Panel Says
The People of the State of New York, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent v. Maurice R. Greenberg, et al., Defendants-Appellants, 401720/05; 13989
State’s Case Against Greenberg Clears Another Barrier to Trial
In this Special Report from the New York Law Journal, brought to you free by University of Houston,: "Changing the 'How' But Not the 'Why'," "J.D. Advantage Versus J.D. Required: The Old Rules No Longer Apply," "The Writing You'll Do, and the Writing They'll Read," "Think Outside the Box to Showcase Skills Firms Really Seek" and "Networking Your Way to a Great Legal Career."